Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Making Rape Victims Pay for Rape Kits?

I recently had a friend raped and go through the rape kit process. Today they got the bill. A $5000 bill. Ridiculous. My case happens to be in Texas, but this is not only a state problem.
“A rape kit is a set of items that specially trained medial staff use to gather and preserve evidence of a sexual assault. A woman can decline the process, which can take up to four hours, but going to an emergency room and undergoing this additional intrusion helps document the attack and gives law enforcement evidence it needs to investigate the crime and prosecute the rapist.”
A disabled woman in North Dakota who was brutally raped by an acquaintance. While this woman was recovering from surgery required to repair her internal organs after the rape she received a bill from her hospital for the cost of her rape kit. She was eventually able to get her state's victim compensation board to pay the hospital, but in the meantime she kept receiving notices from the hospital's bill collector.
"I could not believe this was happening to me, after all this," she told me. "It got resolved, thank God, but not before I started to worry that my inability to come up with the money to pay the hospital would jeopardize my case. They tell me it wouldn't have, but it was so much worry that I didn't need."
This is just one example of what victim’s go through. No crime victim should be asked to pay to collect evidence and it is even more horrifying that this would be asked of survivors of a heinous crime like sexual violence who have already demonstrated enormous courage and commitment to justice in submitting to the examination. A victim agrees to the collection of a rape kit in the hope that DNA testing will help police apprehend her (and sometimes his) assailant. Charging the victim to collect the evidence is so foreign to our sense of justice and basic compassion that it is comforting to believe is limited to these few places.
No one explains this problem better then Sarah Tofte, US Program researcher:
"The federal Violence Against Women Act prohibits states from charging victims for rape kit collection, or risk losing federal funding, and every state has passed a law to implement this requirement. This is a significant and necessary reform, but its effect is limited by weak state laws and the way hospitals, the police, prosecutors, and victim compensation funds interpret and carry out their obligation to assume the cost of rape kit collection."
Some state laws are simply inadequate. For example, Oklahoma's law caps compensation for rape victims at $450. This covers barely one-third of the estimated cost of collecting a rape kit in that state. Maine's law caps compensation at $500.The laws in North Dakota, Oregon, and the District of Columbia allow the victim to seek compensation for any cost she incurs for the collection of her rape kit. This means that the victim may first have to pay the bill herself, and then apply for compensation. In Montana, the victim is supposed to be compensated as long as the victim compensation fund does not run out and as long as she cooperates with the investigation.
Other states, like Texas, have laws that appear adequate but can be poorly executed. Texas's statute seems clear: law enforcement must pay the cost of a rape kit. In practice, the payment process is far from simple. In February 2009, I spoke with a rape victim in Texas who received a notice from the hospital that the police had paid $700 toward the cost of the exam, leaving her responsible for the remaining $800. She didn't know about the victim compensation fund, and made two payments of $50 each before a victim's advocate helped her to apply to the fund, which eventually paid the remainder.
The woman told Human Rights Watch: "I don't understand why they had to involve me at all. Why couldn't [the victim compensation fund] and the police and the hospital have worked it out on their own? The payment of my rape kit seemed like a big hassle."
If rape kits are to be treated like fingerprints collected at a robbery - in fact like every other kind of forensic evidence - then states should assume the full cost, in every case, regardless of the circumstances. States also need to prohibit the parties responsible for payment, such as hospitals, from billing the rape victim or pressing her to pay the bill and seek compensation later.  
Women should never have to file an insurance claim in connection with a rape kit. A rape kit isn't treatment. It is part of a criminal investigation, and neither they nor their insurance carrier should in any way be forced to bear even temporary cost of this procedure.
For more information see:

Madonna Comes Out About Rape



Pop Icon Madonna recently revealed in Harper’s Bazaar Magazine that she too was a victim of rape. She describes how her rough start in NYC motivated her and inspired her work, making her one of the most recognizable names in the U.S.  

She described her younger years as being seen as “strange,” keeping her from making many friends.

“But it all turned out good in the end, because when you aren’t popular and you don’t have a social life, it gives you more time to focus on your future.”

She moved to New York City to make herself famous, but it wasn’t all flashing lights and parties.
“My apartment (was) broken into three times. I don’t know why; I had nothing of value after they took my radio the first time,” the “Vogue” singer wrote. “The first year, I was held up at gunpoint. Raped on the roof of a building I was dragged up to with a knife in my back.”

On that roof she was brutally raped. Though Madonna does not specify how old she was, the Michigan native arrived in the Big Apple in 1978 — meaning she would be around 20 at the time of the attack.

The budding star did not report the sex assault to cops, Lucy O’Brien wrote in her 2007 biography, “Madonna: Like an Icon.” Instead, she “internalized” the brutality that left her “crying and shaking on the roof.” The incident became a crucial moment not only personally, but also in Madonna’s artistic development.

“Her anger at the attack came out afterward in a need for complete sexual control,” O’Brien said. “Sex became a mask, a way of psychologically turning the tables on her attacker.”

The assault became a source of endless motivation for the Material Girl.  “She encountered her own worst possible scenario, becoming a victim of male violence, and thereafter turned that full-tilt into her work, reversing the equation at every opportunity,” O’Brien wrote.

Throughout the essay Madonna returns to a theme she’s certainly familiar with: Daring.
“If I can’t be daring in my work or the way I live my life, then I don’t really see the point of being on this planet,” she wrote.

At the age of 35 she decided fearlessness meant something much different than it did when she was 25. “I needed to be more than a girl with gold teeth and gangster boyfriends,” Madonna wrote. “More than a sexual provocateur imploring girls not to go for second-best baby.”

Instead, she found stimulation in Kaballah, “a mystical interpretation of the Old Testament.” The controversy over her spiritual awakening baffled her. “Was I doing something dangerous? It forced me to ask myself, Is trying to have a relationship with God daring? Maybe it is,” she wrote.

Ten years later, she would reinvent herself again, this time by moving to England and adopting two children from Malawi.

Props to Madonna for sharing her story. I think the more celebrities come out about what they've been through the more they inspire the new generation to not be afraid and to do something good with what they've experienced. End the silence and RISE.


Check out more about R.I.S.E. at any of the following:

Montana Teacher Rape Case

In a widely covered news story, a Montana teacher, Stacey Rambold, was sentenced and released from prison after serving only 30 days in jail. He will still have to register as a sex offender and is considered to be on probation until 2028, but his sentence has been heavily criticized by the people.

Rambold was convicted of raping Cherice Moralez, a 14-year-old girl and one of his students, in 2007. When his case went to trail Moralez took her own lifein 2010 before Rambold went to trial.
In an interview with the Associated Press Moralez's mother, Auliea Hanlon, said that man has managed to avoid what she considers to be justice.“I figured he'd be fired, go to jail, and she would be vindicated, and that would be the end of it,” Hanlon said. “Instead, here it is six years later, still going on, and he's getting out.... He's still skating.” 
“I considered going down to the jail to forgive him, but I don't know,” she said. “I'm still waiting for a sign from God.” Tears streamed down Auliea Hanlon's face as she described the emotions that have at times overwhelmed her since a church counselor her daughter confided in first told Hanlon about the rape. 
Hanlon has said Rambold's actions were a "major factor" in her daughter's suicide. Moralez felt guilty for ruining Rambold's life, and was ostracized and ridiculed by her peers after details in the case became public, Hanlon said. Hanlon said her focus remains on Rambold and the appeal of his sentence, which prosecutors said could take six to 18 months to work its way through the Montana Supreme Court.
So what was the reasoning for the judge’s decision on the light sentence? Judge G. Todd Baugh said that the girl was “older than her chronological age” and “as much in control of the situation as was the defendant.” This of course caused a huge backlash with the general populace. Women’s advocates including the state chapter of National Organization for Women filed a complaint against Baugh and delivered petitions with 144,000 signatures along with the complaint to the state Judicial Standards Commission. The complaint asks that Baugh be removed from the bench “for his misconduct related to his handling of and speech about the rape case involving the sentencing of Stacey Rambold.”

Baugh did release and official apology saying: “I made some really stupid remarks. It didn't come out right and I owe the whole county, but maybe even the whole country, especially women, an apology.” But it seems to be too little, too late with the people.
Rambold acknowledged his actions in a 2010 deferred prosecution agreement made after Moralez killed herself. The agreement allowed Rambold to remain free for more than three years until he was kicked out of a sex offender treatment program for unauthorized visits with relatives' children.  He was returned to court and sentenced as part of a new arrangement in August. 
According to the current agreement in the case, Rambold must register as a level one sex offender, which means he must make his residence open to officers for home visits. He is barred from working with children. 
State officials are also asking Montana's higher courts to send Rambold back to prison for a longer term. Prosecutors said Baugh's lenient sentence was not allowed under a state law that requires Rambold to serve a mandatory minimum of two years in prison. 
In court documents and during the sentencing hearing, Lansing described his client as a one-time offender with no prior record who took responsibility for his actions when he admitted to a single count of rape under a 2010 deferred prosecution agreement that was made after Moralez killed herself. The agreement with prosecutors allowed Rambold to remain free for more than three years until he was kicked out of his sex offender treatment and for not disclosing that he was in a sexual relationship with a Washington woman.
I hope this case continues to shine light on the easy slap on the wrist sentences that rapists and abusers like this continue to receive. Everyone, including the media, keeps forgetting that this girl has died. She committed the ultimate and final act. The pain and torture she felt was too much and she took her own life because of victim blaming. This has to end; we have to start showing more love and less hate to those that have been tortured by men like this.
This is where you can make a difference. Reach out a hand to those who feel alone. Reach out to those that are afraid to come forward for this very reason. Show them how to RISE.
For more information see:
Check out more about R.I.S.E. at any of the following: